Diagnosis and evaluation of criteria for conducting surgical treatment in women with cystocele and stress urinary incontinence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34287/MMT.1(48).2021.8Abstract
Purpose of the study. Clarification of absolute and relative criteria for the surgical treatment of pelvic pelvic prolapse (PMT) and stress urinary incontinence (SNA).
Materials and methods. A survey was conducted on 85 patients in whom OST and SNA were detected. The women were divided into groups according to the stage of POMT and SNM: 2nd group – 32 patients with PIDs of stages I and II and SNM 2a, 2b types of lung and moderate severity; Group 3 (main) – 53 patients with MIDI III and IV stages and MSM type 3 moderate and severe severity. This group of patients subsequently undergone operative treatment according to the patent for utility model No. 109201. The main group (3rd group) included: 3a group – 28 women from the OMT III and IV stages and SNM 3rd type of medium and severe severity without delay in urination; 3b group – 25 women with STI III and IV stages and SNM of type 3 of moderate and severe degree of severity with delay of urination (chronic or acute). 15 women were examined without complaints, who entered the control group (1st group).
Results. According to the results of the study, it was recorded that, regardless of the stage of the PMS and SNM, even their minimal manifestations significantly reduced the quality of life of patients (by 64%) due to the impact on the physical, but to a greater extent, on the psychological components of health.
Conclusion. The absolute criterion for operative treatment is a set of prolapse of the pelvic organs (PMTCT), urinary incontinence, vesicularization of the bladder type 2a and above, an increase in the posterior urethro-vascular angle of more than 114 °. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence on the background of OST should necessarily include fixation of the uterine ligation apparatus and surgery on the Berch in connection with significant deformation of the bladder neck.
References
Bezhenar VF, Pod red. Aylamazyana EK. Prolaps tazovyih organov u zhenschin: etiologiya, patogenez, printsipyi diagnostiki.Posobie dlya vrachey SPb;2010.
Bezmenko AA, Berlev IV. Etiologiya i patogenez genitalnogo prolapsa.Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskih bolezney.2011;60(1):129–138.
Guseva EI, Konovalova AN, Geht AB, red. Nevrologiya. Natsionalnoe rukovodstvo. Kratkoe izdanie.M. GEOTAR-Media;2016.688 p.
Nechiporenko NA, Egorova TYu, Yutsevich GV. Sinteticheskie protezyi v hirurgicheskom lechenii zhenschin s vyipadeniem polovyih organov.Akush. i gin. 2009;2: 64–67.
Radzinskiy VE. PerineologiyaV.E. M. MIA; 2010.372 p.
Smolnova TYu, Buyanova SN, Savelev SV. i dr. Fenotipicheskiy simptomokompleks displazii soedinitelnoy tkani u zhenschin.Klinicheskaya meditsina.2003;81(8) 42–48.
Awwad J, Sayegh R, Yeretzian J. et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and predictors of pelvic organ prolapse: a community-based study. Menopause.2012;19(11)1235–1241.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K. et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175 (1): 10–7.
