Unilateral spinal anesthesia and the sciatic nerve block in foot surgery

Authors

  • S. N. Gritsenko State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine
  • S. D. Shapoval State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine
  • R. V. Filimonov State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34287/MMT.4(51).2021.13

Abstract

Purpose of the study. To evaluate the effectiveness of unilateral spinal anesthesia as a method of pain relief during foot surgery. Analyze the effectiveness of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus sciatic nerve block. To develop an algorithm for performing unilateral spinal anesthesia during foot surgery.

Materials and methods. We examined 64 patients who were treated in the department of purulent surgery of the 3rd city hospital in Zaporozhye with a diagnosis of diabetic foot syndrome in the period from 2017 to 2019.

Research methods. Assessment of the level of pain intensity using the standard visual analogue scale and the concentration of glucose in the blood serum. Monitoring of the parameters of the cardiovascular system, the temperature of the skin of the lower leg during anesthesia, Doppler scanning of the peripheral circulation in the foot.

Results. 4 hours after performing anesthesia, the intensity of pain during movement of the lower limb, according to the visual analogue scale in the group with unilateral spinal anesthesia was 2,3 times less than in the group with sciatic nerve block (p < 0,05). After 10 hours – in the sciatic nerve block group there was a 9,4% increase in comparison with the unilateral spinal anesthesia group (p < 0,05). Compared with the unilateral spinal anesthesia group, in the sciatic nerve block group 20 minutes after anesthesia, the heart rate decreased by 7,2% (p < 0,05). After unilateral spinal anesthesia, the level of systolic blood pressure on 1 toe of the foot increased by 18,3% 20 minutes after anesthesia, and 20 minutes after sciatic nerve block – by 13,7% (p < 0,05). In patients with the unilateral spinal anesthesia group, the temperature on the operated lower limb after anesthesia increased by 3,8%, in the sciatic nerve block group – by 2,8% (p < 0,05).

Conclusions. Regional anesthesia is the main method of choice for foot surgery compared to general anesthesia. sciatic nerve block does not in all cases lead to 100% surgical anesthesia and requires additional medical analgosedation. For foot surgery, unilateral spinal anesthesia is preferred.

References

Shapoval SD, Savon IL, Smirnova DA, Sofilkanych MM. Harakteristika mikrocirkuljacii nizhnih konechnostej u pacientov s oslozhnennym sindromom diabeticheskoj stopy.Novosti hirurgii. 2013;№ 3(21):54–60.

Kohno VN, Loktin EM, Fljagin TS, Shpagina LA. Prolongirovannaja blokada seda lishhnogo nerva v rannem posleoperacionnom periode pri sindrome diabeticheskoj stopy. Medi cina i obrazovanie v Sibiri. 2013; № 1:23–26.

Lipsky BA, Richard JL, Lavigne JP. Diabetic foot ulcer microbiome: one small step for molecular microbiology one giant leap for understanding diabetic foot ulcers? Diabetes. 2013;62 (3):679–681.

Tobalem M, Lévigne D, Modarressi A. Hyperglycemia interacts with ischemia in a synergistic way on wound repair and myofibroblast differentiation. PlastReconstrSurg Glob Open. 2015; Jul. 3 (7): Р. 471–475.

Osipova NA, Petrova VV. Bol' v hirurgii. Sredstva i sposoby zashhity. Medicinskoe informacionnoe agentstvo. 2013. S. 235–253.

Orudzheva SA, Zvjagin AA. Osobennosti i vozmozhnosti anesteziologicheskogo obespechenija pri hirurgicheskom lechenii sindroma diabeticheskoj stopy. Regionarnaja anestezija i lechenie ostroj boli. 2015; 1(IX):14–25.

Bazheev PD, Avseenko ND, Tuktarova DR, Chuhno VS. Vlijanie regionarnoj anestezii na dinamiku pokazatelej sistemy gemostaza sovremennye problemy anesteziologii-reanimatologii. Materialy Vserossijskoj na- uchnoprakticheskoj konferencii (Chitinskaja gosudarstvennaja medicinskaja akademija). Chita: RIC ChGMA, 2016. S. 13–15.

Witkin LR, Gulati A, Zhang T, Karl HW. Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment. Peripheral Nerve Entrapments. 2016. Р 667–681

Wang J, Liu GT, Mayo HG, Joshi GP. Pain management for elective foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgere. 2015; 54:625–635.

Johnson RL, Kopp SL, Burkle CM. Neuraxialvs general anaesthesia for total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative-effectiveness research. Br J Anaesth 2016;116 (2):163–176.

van der Wal S, van den Heuvel S, Radema SA, van Berkum B, Vaneker M, Steegers M, et al. Thein vitromechanisms andin vivoefficacy of intravenous lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in acute and chronic pain. European Journal of Pain [Internet]. 2015;20(5):655-674. Available from: doi:10.1002/ejp.794..

Murashova NA, Ljuboshevskij PA, Larionov SV, Ganert AN. Ocenka sostojanija vegetativnoj nervnoj sistemy u pacientov s travmoj distal'nogo otdela nizhnej konechnosti v perioperacionnom periode v zavisimosti ot vida anestezii. Regionarnaja anestezija i leche- nie ostroj boli. 2015; № 3(IX): 14–18.

Farag E, Atin A, Ghosh R, Bauer M [et al.]. Comparison ofthree techniques forultrasound-guided femoral nerve catheter insertion: a randomized, blinded trial. Anesthesiology. 2014; Aug; 121 (2):239–248.

Lahin RE, Shhegolev AV, Panov VA, Kuligin AV. Maloob#emnaja spinal'naja anestezija pri artroskopii kolennogo sustava. Saratovskij nauchno-medicinskij zhurnal. 2015;11 (2):126–128.

Sofilkanych MM.Udoskonalennja hirurgichnogo ta kompleksnogo likuvannja hvoryh z gnijno-nekrotychnymy uskladnennjamy stopy diabetyka: [Dysertacija na zdobuttja naukovogo stupenja kandydata medychnyh nauk: 14.01.03]. Zaporizhzhja, 2015.

Nicholls B, Kapral S, Marhofer P. The use of ultrasound to aid local anesthetic nerve blocks in adults. Cambridge university press. 2016;167–192.

Thomas F Bendtsen. Do ultrasound-guided regional blocks signify anew paradigm in high- risk patients? Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2016; 30: 191–200.

Kiasari A, Babaei A, Alipour A, Motevalli S, Baradari A. Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Medical Archives [Internet]. 2017;71(4):274. Available from: doi:10.5455/medarh.2017.71.274-279.

Basenko IL, Suslov OS, Volodychev DS. Rekomendacii' tret'ogo z’i'zdu american society of regional anaesthesia stosovno systemnoi' tok- sychnosti miscevyh anestetykiv. Klinichna anes- teziologija ta intensyvna terapija. 2018;2(12):98–108. DOI 10.31379/2411.2616.12.2.11.

Byshovec' SM, Dzjuba DO. Odnobichna subarahnoi'dal'na blokada dlja intraoperacij- nogo zneboljuvannja plastyky pahovogo kanalu. Medycyna nevidkladnyh staniv. 2020; 16(2):49–52. http://lib.inmeds.com.ua:8080/ jspui/handle/lib/1910.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Gritsenko, S. N. ., Shapoval, S. D. ., & Filimonov, R. V. . (2021). Unilateral spinal anesthesia and the sciatic nerve block in foot surgery. Modern Medical Technology, (4), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.34287/MMT.4(51).2021.13

Issue

Section

Original research