Unilateral spinal block formation by Tachyphylaxis method

Authors

  • R. V. Filimonov State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine
  • S. A. Potalov State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine
  • S. D. Shapoval State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine
  • Yu. Yu. Malyuk State Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Ukraine
  • D. G. Burtsev State Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Ukraine
  • Ye. V. Petrashenok State Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Ukraine
  • Yu. Yu. Kobelyatskiy State Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Ukraine
  • I. V. Filimonova State institution "Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education Ministry of Health of Ukraine", Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34287/MMT.3(46).2020.5

Abstract

Thearticlepresentsthetheoreticaljustification and comparative experience in the formation of a unilateral spinal block by tachyphylaxis in urgent surgery during operations on the lower extremities. The possibility of influencing the duration and severity of motor blockade on the operated side was established using the tachyphylaxis method for administering the anesthetic without decreasing the quality of anesthesia as a whole and without increasing the amount of anesthetic administered. The possibility of reducing the development time of full anesthesia to a minimum fixation time of anesthetic on nerve tissue (10 minutes) due to preliminary «sensitization» to nerve fiber anesthetics was established. The possibility of reducing the need for postoperative analgesia by increasing the duration of the postoperative painless period has been established.

References

Malroy M. Local anesthesia. The second stereotyped edition (ed. Prof. S. I. Emelyanov). 2005. Moscow. RF.

Shifman EM, Filipovich GV. Spinal anesthesia in obstetrics. Neyrofiziologicheskiye osnovy spinnomozgovoy anestezii. 2012; 4 (3): 58–65.

Nedashkovsky EV, Kuzkov VV. Basic course of an anesthesiologist. World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists. 2010. Arkhangelsk. RF.

Clemens Sirtl. Anästhesiologisches Notizbuch/Clemens Sirtl, Franz Jesch//Wiss. Vert.-Abt. GmbH. 1995: 14–58.

Lakhin RE. Differences in the level of temperature, sensory and motor blockade with traditional and unilateral methods of spinal anesthesia. Vestnik anesteziologii i reanimatologii. 2015; 12 (1): 29–33.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-20

How to Cite

Filimonov, R. V. ., Potalov, S. A. ., Shapoval, S. D. ., Malyuk, Y. Y. ., Burtsev, D. G. ., Petrashenok, Y. V. ., Kobelyatskiy, Y. Y. ., & Filimonova, I. V. . (2020). Unilateral spinal block formation by Tachyphylaxis method. Modern Medical Technology, (3), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.34287/MMT.3(46).2020.5

Issue

Section

Original research