Variations and anomalies in the structure and branching of lumbosacral spinal nerve roots: a case report and global insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34287/MMT.3(58).2023.7Abstract
Aim. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical course of lumbosacral spinal nerve root anomalies / variants Type I according to the A. Neidre and I. MacNab’s classification, along with a retrospective MRI data analysis before surgery, focusing on the unique branching and topography of the spinal nerve roots. Additionally, we aim to address the relevance of correlating preoperative visualized features with the presence of anatomical anomalies attributed to these spinal nerve root variations, and their implications on the clinical presentation. Our study aims to compare our findings with the global diagnostic experience, classification, and specific aspects of performing discectomies based on individual anatomical characteristics of the lumbosacral region.
Results. We present data from our own observation, when during surgery, a probable verification of a Type I lumbosacral spinal nerve root anomaly / variation according to the A. Neidre and I. MacNab’s classification was discovered in a patient. The anomaly appeared as a dense mass resembling a nerve root in the structural characteristics but with a significantly larger diameter. It emerged from the dural space at the level of the upper third of the L5 arch and then divided into two parts. A thinner bundle, comparable in diameter to a normal nerve root, exited through the L5-S1 intervertebral foramen, while a considerably thicker bundle followed a path parallel to the axis of the dural sac and exited through the S1-S2 intervertebral foramen.
Comparison with global clinical observations revealed that despite the significant clinical and surgical implications, several aspects of this anomaly remain poorly studied and require further exploration and systematization.
Conclusions. The lumbosacral nerve root anomalies (LSNRA) demonstrate a variety of structural variations and branching patterns, which are reflected in different classifications. Among the professional community, the classification of LSNRA, developed by A. Neidre and I. MacNab in 1983 and supplemented by S. M. Burke et al. in 2013, is recognized as the most relevant and frequently applied. While changes in vertebral bone structures can be easily diagnosed using modern imaging methods, preoperative diagnosis of LSNRA proves to be challenging, and the informativeness of standard MRI is limited, as confirmed by the clinical case presented. The dissonance between prominent neurological symptoms and relatively minor disc protrusion allows for the potential presence of a root variation/anomaly when planning the lumbar spine discectomy.
The most informative diagnostic method for LSNRA is MR neurography. Among the radiological signs of Type I lumbоsacral nerve root anomalies, the following are considered valid: “corner sign”, “fat crescent sign”, and “parallel sign”. The verification of LSNRA is predominantly intraoperatively based on a series of characteristic topographicanatomical features, including atypical locations of the root’s origin from the dural sac, “unusual” nerve root exit angle, even up to a right angle, and technical challenges in root mobilization during routine lumbar discectomy procedures.
References
Blamoutier A. Surgical discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: surgical techniques. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(1 Suppl):S187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.005.
Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the Intervertebral Disc with Involvement of the Spinal Canal. NEJM. 1934;211(5):210-5. 10.1056/nejm193408022110506.
Love JG. Protruded Intervertebral Disc (Fibrocartilage): (Section of Orthopaedics and Section of Neurology). Proc R Soc Med. 1939;32(12):1697-721. doi: 10.1177/003591573903201244.
Simpson AK, Lightsey HM 4th, Xiong GX, Crawford AM, Minamide A, Schoenfeld AJ. Spinal endoscopy: evidence, techniques, global trends, and future projections. Spine J. 2022;22(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j. spinee.2021.07.004.
Webb J, Gottschalk L, Lee YP, Garfin S, Kim C. Surgeon Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. SAS J. 2008;2(3):145. doi: 10.1016/ S1935-9810(08)70032-X.
Haijiao W, Koti M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D. Diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root anomalies by magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord. 2001;14(2):143-9. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200104000-00009.
Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152(10):2399-404. doi: 10.1016/j. pain.2011.07.005.
Yılmaz T, Turan Y, Gülşen I, Dalbayrak S. Co-occurrence of lumbar spondylolysis and lumbar disc herniation with lumbosacral nerve root anomaly. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2014;5(2):99-101. doi: 10.4103/09748237.139211.
Zagnoni C. Reperto di un tipo non conosciuto di anastomosi nervosa delle radici spinali. Atti Soc Med Chir Padova. 1949;27:48-52.
Ethelberg S, Riishede J. Malformation of lumbar spinal roots and sheaths in the causation of low backache and sciatica. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952;34B(3):442-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.34B3.442.
Deyerle Wm, May Vr Jr. Sciatica; etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop. 1954;4:166-79.
Artico M, Carloia S, Piacentini M, Ferretti G, Dazzi M, Franchitto S, et al. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: observations on three cases and review of the literature. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2006;17(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/ s1130-1473(06)70370-0.
Postacchini F, Urso S, Ferro L. Lumbosacral nerve-root anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(5):721-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-19826405000009.
White JG 3rd, Strait TA, Binkley JR, Hunter SE. Surgical treatment of 63 cases of conjoined nerve roots. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(1):114-7. doi: 10.3171/ jns.1982.56.1.0114.
Lotan R, Al-Rashdi A, Yee A, Finkelstein J. Clinical features of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots versus lumbar intervertebral disc herniations. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(7):1094-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1329-6.
Burke SM, Safain MG, Kryzanski J, Riesenburger RI. Nerve root anomalies: implications for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery and a review of the Neidre and Macnab classification system. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(2):E9. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS1349.
Schmidt CK, Rustagi T, Alonso F, Loukas M, Chapman JR, Oskouian RJ, et al. Nerve root anomalies: making sense of a complicated literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017;33(8):1261-73. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3457-3.
Sadler TW, Langman J. Langman’s medical embryology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Hashmi SS, van Staalduinen EK, Massoud TF. Anatomy of the Spinal Cord, Coverings, and Nerves. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2022;32(4):903-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2022.07.025.
Maiuri F, Gambardella A. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. Neurol Res. 1989;11(3):130-5. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1989.11739877.
Kuroki H, Nagai T. Conjoined nerve root in a patient with lumbar disc herniation accompanied by a lumbosacral spine anomaly: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03749-1.
Okuwaki T, Kunogi J, Hasue M. Conjoined nerve roots associated with lumbosacral spine anomalies. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(11):1347-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199111000-00018.
Jokhi VH, Ponde SV, Sonawane C, Bansal SS, Chavhan A. Conjoint Lumbosacral Nerve Root-A Case Report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2015;5(4):14-6. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.334.
Davidson D, Rowan R, Reilly C. Lumbosacral nerve root anomaly associated with spondylolisthesis in an adolescent: a case report and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19):E718-21. doi: 10.1097/01. brs.0000232808.09107.f4.
Popa I, Poenaru DV, Oprea MD, Andrei D. Intraoperative conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots associated with spondylolisthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23 Suppl 1:S115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1185-2.
Rask MR. Anomalous lumbosacral nerve roots associated with spondylolisthesis. Surg Neurol. 1977;8(2):139-40.
Cannon BW, Hunter SE, Picaza JA. Nerve-rootanomalies in lumbar-disc surgery. J Neurosurg. 1962;19:208-14. doi: 10.3171/jns.1962.19.3.0208
Kadish LJ, Simmons EH. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. An anatomical investigation and myelographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(3):411-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.66B3.6725353.
Neidre A, MacNab I. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. Review of 16 cases and classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8(3):294-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198304000-00010.
Sharma A, Singh V, Agrawal R, Mangale N, Deepak P, Savla J, et al. Conjoint Nerve Root an Intraoperative Challenge in Minimally Invasive Tubular Discectomy. Asian Spine J. 2021;15(4):545-9. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0250.
Taghipour M, Razmkon A, Hosseini K. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: analysis of cases diagnosed intraoperatively. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(6):413-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818f00a0.
Coughlin JR, Miller JD. Metrizamide myelography in conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1983;34(1):23-5.
Gomez JG, Dickey JW, Bachow TB. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;120(3-4):155-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02112035.
Oh CH, Park JS, Choi WS, Choi E, Ji GY. Radiological anatomical consideration of conjoined nerve root with a case review. Anat Cell Biol. 2013;46(4):291-5. doi: 10.5115/acb.2013.46.4.291.
Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Kim HK, Ryu JA, et al. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots compromised by disk herniation: sagittal shoulder sign for the preoperative diagnosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(3):225-31. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0421-4.
Song SJ, Lee JW, Choi JY, Hong SH, Kim NR, Kim KJ, et al. Imaging features suggestive of a conjoined nerve root on routine axial MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(2):133-8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0403-6.
Heo DH, Kim SW, Chang HH, Park CK. Usefulness of Oblique Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nerve Root Anomalies and Extraforaminal Entrapment Lesions. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(3):423-7. doi: 10.4184/ asj.2018.12.3.423.
Heo DH, Lee MS, Sheen SH, Cho SM, Cho YJ, Oh SM. Simple oblique lumbar magnetic resonance imaging technique and its diagnostic value for extraforaminal disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(22):2419-23. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b96187.
Chhabra A, Madhuranthakam AJ, Andreisek G. Magnetic resonance neurography: current perspectives and literature review. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(2):698-707. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4976-8.
Engar C, Wadhwa V, Weinberg B, Chhabra A. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: direct demonstration on MR neurography. Clin Imaging. 2014;38(6):892-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.07.009.
Peyster RG, Teplick JG, Haskin ME. Computed tomography of lumbosacral conjoined nerve root anomalies. Potential cause of false-positive reading for herniated nucleus pulposus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10(4):331-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198505000-00008.
Maiuri F, Gangemi M, Gambardella A. Anatomical and radiological variations of the lumbar dural sac and nerve root sheaths. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1990;92(3):203-13. doi: 10.1016/0303-8467(90)90022-w.
Bosnjak R, Makovec M. Neurophysiological monitoring of S1 root function during microsurgical posterior discectomy using H-reflex and spinal nerve root potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(4):423-9. doi: 10.1097/ BRS.0b013e3181b9654f.
Macdonald DB, Stigsby B, Al Homoud I, Abalkhail T, Mokeem A. Utility of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative nerve root monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29(2):118-25. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31824ceeaf.
Makovec M, Benedicic M, Bosnjak R. H wave and spinal root potentials in neuromonitoring of S1 root function during evacuation of herniated disc: preliminary results. Croat Med J. 2006;47(2):298-304.
Shin DJ, Lee YS, Choi E, Yi JS. Nerve root anomaly as a cause of unexpected outcomes of epidural steroid injections in lumbar radiculopathy: A case report. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(5):971-6. doi: 10.3233/ BMR-210226.
