The importance of using mobile ultrasound devices in improving the quality and safety of emergency care, anesthesia and intensive care

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/mmt.2025.1.318152

Keywords:

ultrasonography, anesthesiology, analgesia, intensive care, invasive manipulations, emergency conditions

Abstract

The aim of this review is to determine the role of ultrasound visualization in improving the safety and quality of anesthesia, intensive care and emergency medical care.

The article explores the role of ultrasound imaging in improving the quality and safety of diagnostics, analgesia, and intensive care, particularly in emergency conditions. The authors emphasize the importance of using portable ultrasound devices that enhance diagnostic accuracy and enable bedside or prehospital procedures. The study highlights the significance of ultrasound protocols, such as POCUS, FAST, eFAST, LUCI, and others which standardize diagnostics and invasive interventions. These protocols have proven to be effective in diagnosing shock states, pneumothorax, internal organ injuries, and critical complications. Ultrasound is also widely used to improve the safety of invasive procedures like central venous catheterization, regional nerve blocks, and epidural anesthesia. In children, ultrasound helps to reduce the number of complications during procedures due to its high accuracy of visualization. The authors point out that ultrasound is an important tool for monitoring the condition of patients with respiratory and heart failure, allowing for the prompt detection of pathological changes in the lungs and heart. In addition, the use of ultrasound examination significantly reduces the radiation exposure compared to X-rays and computerized tomography scans.

Despite significant progress, there are limitations related to the anatomical features of patients, the difficulty of finding acoustic windows, and the need for specialized training of doctors. Future developments include further standardization of protocols, improvement of ultrasound device capabilities, and the creation of international training programs.

Conclusions. Ultrasound visualization improves the quality of diagnosis, anesthesia and intensive care, significantly increases the accuracy and safety of invasive procedures. Using ultrasonic visualization methods can be problematic in cases where it is difficult to find an acoustic window. Further expansion of the use of the POCUS concept and integration of ultrasound into life support algorithms are related to the development of available compact, highly sensitive ultrasound devices suitable for prehospital diagnostics.

Author Biographies

A. A. Krishtafor, Dnipro State Medical University

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

D. A. Krishtafor, Dnipro State Medical University

MD, PhD, Assistant of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

O. V. Kravets, Dnipro State Medical University

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

O. V. Pylypenko, Dnipro State Medical University

MD, Assistant of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

References

  1. Kendall JL, Hoffenberg SR, Smith RS. History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: The evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(Suppl):S126-S130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000260623.38982
  2. Schmidt S, Dieks J-K, Quintel M, Moerer O. Clinical decision-making in practice with new critical care ultrasound methods for assessing respiratory function and haemodynamics in critically ill patients. Clin Pract. 2022;12(6):986-1000. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12060102
  3. Lau YH, See KC. Point-of-care ultrasound for critically ill patients: A mini-review of key diagnostic features and protocols. World J Crit Care Med. 2022;11(2):70-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i2.70
  4. Jensen MB, Sloth E, Larsen KM, Schmidt MB. Transthoracic echocardiography for cardiopulmonary monitoring in intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(9):700-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021504009068
  5. Spencer KT, Kimura BJ, Korcarz CE, Pellikka PA, Rahko PS, Siegel RJ. Focused cardiac ultrasound: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(6):567-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.04.001
  6. Neskovic AN, Skinner H, Price S, Via G, De Hert S, Stankovic I, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound core curriculum and core syllabus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(5):475-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey006
  7. Chin EJ, Chan CH, Mortazavi R, Anderson CL, Kahn CA, Summers S, et al. A pilot study examining the viability of a prehospital assessment with ultrasound for emergencies (PAUSE) protocol. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(1):142-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.03.033
  8. Seif D, Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. Bedside ultrasound in resuscitation and the rapid ultrasound in shock protocol. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:503254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/503254
  9. Lau YH, Loh CH, Fong WK, Siddiqui S, Tan CK, Tan JJ, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound training among intensivists in Singapore: A multicentre survey. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020;49(9):630-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020108
  10. Peris A, Tutino L, Zagli G, Batacchi S, Cianchi G, Spina R, et al. The use of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound significantly reduces the number of radiographs and computed tomography scans in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(3):687-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e7cc42
  11. Bataille B, Riu B, Ferre F, Moussot PE, Mari A, Brunel E, et al. Integrated use of bedside lung ultrasound and echocardiography in acute respiratory failure: A prospective observational study in ICU. Chest. 2014;146(6):1586-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0443
  12. Long B, Alerhand S, Maliel K, Koyfman A. Echocardiography in cardiac arrest: An emergency medicine review. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(3):488-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.044
  13. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: From the mouth to the lungs and pleurae. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(2):253-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0309-5
  14. Hoyer HX, Vogl S, Schiemann U, Haug A, Stolpe E, Michalski T. Prehospital ultrasound in emergency medicine: Incidence, feasibility, indications and diagnoses. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010;17(5):254-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328336ae9e
  15. Yoshida T, Yoshida T, Noma H, Nomura T, Suzuki A, Mihara T. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04495-6
  16. Na MJ. Diagnostic tools of pleural effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2014;76(5):199-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2014.76.5.199
  17. Scarlata S, Venditti I, Fulco G, Finamore P, Giua R, Antonelli Incalzi R, et al. Estimation of pleural effusion volume through chest ultrasound: Validation of two multiplanar models. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46(8):1960-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.020
  18. Mongodi S, Via G, Girard M, Rouquette I, Misset B, Braschi A, et al. Lung ultrasound for early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2016;149(4):969-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.012
  19. Mongodi S, De Vita N, Salve G, Bonaiti S, Daverio F, Cavagnino M, et al. The role of lung ultrasound monitoring in early detection of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective observational study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):3001. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113001
  20. Pradhan S, Shrestha PS, Shrastha GS, Marhatta MN. Clinical impact of lung ultrasound monitoring for diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A diagnostic randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2020;58:65-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.04.008
  21. Millot G, Voisin B, Loiez C, Wallet F, Nseir S. Early detection of ventilator-associated pneumonia: Bedside tools. Egypt J Crit Care Med. 2020;7(22):74-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejccm.2020.01.001
  22. Rocca E, Zanza C, Longhitano Y, Piccolella F, Romenskaya T, Racca F, et al. Lung ultrasound in critical care and emergency medicine: Clinical review. Adv Respir Med. 2023;91(3):203-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/arm91030017
  23. Dinsmore M, Venkatraghavan L. Clinical applications of point-of-care ultrasound in brain injury: A narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2022;77 Suppl 1:69-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15604
  24. Newman WD, Hollman AS, Dutton GN, Carachi R. Measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter by ultrasound: A means of detecting acute raised intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(10):1109-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.10.1109
  25. Gauthey M, Tessaro MO, Breitbart S, Kulkarni AV, Davis AL. Reliability and feasibility of optic nerve point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric patients with ventricular shunts. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022;38(7):1289-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05532-x
  26. Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(7):1059-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2
  27. Heldeweg ML, Vermue L, Kant M, Brouwer M, Girbes AR, Haaksma ME, et al. The impact of lung ultrasound on clinical-decision making across departments: A systematic review. Ultrasound J. 2014;14(1):5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00253-3
  28. Choi W, Cho YS, Ha YR, Oh JH, Lee H, Kang BS, et al. Role of point-of-care ultrasound in critical care and emergency medicine: Update and future perspective. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023;10(4):363-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.101
  29. Marbach JA, Almufleh A, Di Santo P, Jung R, Simard T, McInnes M, et al. Comparative accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasonography and clinical examination for left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):264-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0070
  30. Siadecki SD, Frasure SE, Lewiss RE, Saul T. High body mass index is strongly correlated with decreased image quality in focused bedside echocardiography. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(2):295-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.08.006
  31. Jiang L, Zhang F, Wei N, Lv J, Chen W, Dai Z. Could preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth. 2020;34(3):434-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02750-6
  32. Yu D, Wang X, Jiang L, Wu Y, Han S, Li J. Evaluating the impact of ultrasound-guided subsheath versus extrasheath sciatic nerve block on postoperative wound pain in tibial and foot surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2024;21(4):e14640. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14640
  33. Zhu M, Sun W. Application and research progress of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block through costoclavicular space approach in upper limb surgery. Altern Ther Health Med. 2024;30(1):24-30. Available from: http://alternative-therapies.com/pdfarticles/9168.pdf
  34. Attia JZ, Gaber RN, Mohamed SR. Ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach versus costoclavicular approach of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. Pain Physician. 2023;26(6):E651-E660. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2023.26.E651
  35. Jain D, Hussain SY, Ayub A. Comparative evaluation of landmark technique and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection in pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Anesth. 2022;32(1):35-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14332
  36. Chen J, Song D, Zheng G, Luo Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of nerve block under ultrasound in ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric in children. Transl Pediatr. 2022;11(10):1604-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-308
  37. Zawadka M, La Via L, Wong A, Olusanya O, Muscarà L, Continella C, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance as compared with landmark technique for subclavian central venous cannulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Crit Care Med. 2023;51(5):642-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005819
  38. D'Arrigo S, Perna F, Annetta MG, Pittiruti M. Ultrasound-guided access to the axillary vein for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2023;24(4):854-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298211054621
  39. Byon HJ, Lee GW, Lee JH, Park YH, Kim HS, Kim CS, et al. Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for subclavian venous catheterization in children--a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(5):788-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet202
  40. Imbrìaco G, Monesi A, Spencer TR. Preventing radial arterial catheter failure in critical care: Factoring updated clinical strategies and techniques. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022;41(4):101096. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101096
  41. Dhir A, Bhasin D, Bhasin-Chhabra B, Koratala A. Point-of-care ultrasound: A vital tool for anesthesiologists in the perioperative and critical care settings. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e66908. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66908
  42. Osman A, Sum KM. Role of upper airway ultrasound in airway management. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0174-z
  43. Sustić A, Miletić D, Protić A, Ivancić A, Cicvarić T. Can ultrasound be useful for predicting the size of a left double-lumen bronchial tube? Tracheal width as measured by ultrasonography versus computed tomography. J Clin Anesth. 2008;20(4):247-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.11.002
  44. Chacko J, Gagan B, Kumar U, Mundlapudi B. Real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with and without bronchoscopic control: An observational study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(2):166-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10047

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

Krishtafor, A. A., Krishtafor, D. A., Kravets, O. V., & Pylypenko, O. V. (2025). The importance of using mobile ultrasound devices in improving the quality and safety of emergency care, anesthesia and intensive care. Modern Medical Technology, 17(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.14739/mmt.2025.1.318152

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Reviews of literature

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Krishtafor A. A., Krishtafor D. A., Kravets O. V., Pylypenko O. V.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.