Comparative efficacy of combinations of endoscopic classifications and recurrence models for large colorectal laterally spreading tumors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/mmt.2026.1.341504

Keywords:

laterally spreading tumor, endoscopic classification, histology prediction, recurrence, colorectal neoplasia

Abstract

Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LST) are a distinct form of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia that extend laterally along the mucosal surface and often exceed 20 mm in diameter. Despite advances in optical imaging technologies, diagnostic accuracy for large LSTs varies widely among classification systems, emphasizing the need to assess combined endoscopic approaches and recurrence prediction models to improve risk stratification and treatment planning.

Aim. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of combinations of combined endoscopic classifications and recurrence prediction models to identify the most effective approach for granular and non-granular subtypes of laterally spreading tumors.

Materials and methods. A single-center mixed retrospective-prospective study was conducted at the Medical Educational and Scientific Center “University Clinic” (Zaporizhzhia), including 110 patients with LSTs ≥20 mm (2015–2024). Granular (LST-G) and non-granular (LST-NG) lesions were assessed using JNET, Kudo, Modified Sano, and Hiroshima classifications. Six combinations of endoscopic classification systems were tested in parallel to determine diagnostic metrics. The histological evaluation of the resected neoplasia served as the reference standard. Resection techniques included endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), piecemeal EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and hybrid ESD. Recurrence was assessed at 6 months, with its prediction evaluated using the SMSA, SERT, and Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) models.

Results. The JNET + Hiroshima combination showed the highest diagnostic performance (LST-G: 81.82 % (95 % CI, 67.29–91.81 %) sensitivity, 90.91 % (95 % CI, 70.84–98.88 %) specificity, 84.29 % (95 % CI, 72.76–92.30 %) diagnostic accuracy; LST-NG: 86.67 % (95 % CI, 59.54–98.34) sensitivity, 100 % (95 % CI, 86.28–100.00) specificity, 95.00 % (95 % CI, 83.08–99.39 % diagnostic accuracy). JNET + Kudo served as a strong alternative. Progressive histological changes and recurrence were significantly more common among LST-G (68.6 %) than LST-NG (37.5 %). Recurrences were observed only in the LST-G group (8/70). BCM score ≥1 demonstrated the highest predictive ability for recurrence (AUC: 0.78), outperforming SMSA and SERT models which demonstrated poor discrimination (AUC: 0.31–0.37).

Conclusions. The combination of JNET + Hiroshima or JNET + Kudo classifications optimizes histologic prediction in both granular and non-granular large LSTs. LST-Gs demonstrate a higher risk for advanced histology and recurrence. The BCM model is preferable for recurrence prediction in large granular LSTs.

Author Biographies

V. S. Tkachov, Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University

MD, PhD Student of the Department of Faculty Surgery and Oncology

O. M. Kiosov, Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University

MD, PhD, Assistant of the Department of General Surgery and Postgraduate Surgical Education

A. V. Klymenko, Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery and Oncology

References

  1. Darmadi D, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, Kheiri S. Global Disparities in Colorectal Cancer: Unveiling the Present Landscape of Incidence and Mortality Rates, Analyzing Geographical Variances, and Assessing the Human Development Index. J Prev Med Hyg. 2025;65(4):E499-E514. doi: https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.4.3071
  2. Zheng S, Schrijvers J, Greuter M, Kats-Ugurlu G, Lu W, de Bock GH. Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(7):1948. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15071948
  3. Shahsavari D, Waqar M, Thoguluva Chandrasekar V. Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8:26. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-17
  4. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, Hosobe S, Kusaka H, Kobayashi T, et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47(10):880-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.47.10.880
  5. Singh R, Jayanna M, Navadgi S, Ruszkiewicz A, Saito Y, Uedo N. Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia. Dig Endosc. 2013;25 Suppl 2:16-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12075
  6. Kanao H, Tanaka S, Oka S, Hirata M, Yoshida S, Chayama K. Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(3 Pt 2):631-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.028
  7. Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(5):526-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12644
  8. Nagai M, Suzuki S, Minato Y, Ishibashi F, Mochida K, Ohata K, et al. Detecting colorectal lesions with image-enhanced endoscopy: an updated review from clinical trials. Clin Endosc. 2023;56(5):553-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.055
  9. Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy. 2024;56(7):516-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2304-3219
  10. Jiang Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Sun H, Dong Z, Xu S. Discrepancy Between Forceps Biopsy and Resection in Colorectal Polyps: A 1686 Paired Screening-Therapeutic Colonoscopic Finding. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022;18:561-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S358708
  11. Tkachov VS, Klymenko AV, Kiosov OM. [Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic optical evaluation and forceps biopsy in comparison with pathohistological findings of colorectal laterally spreading tumors]. Pathologia. 2024;21(2):106-12. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2024.2.302882
  12. Wang Y, Li WK, Wang YD, Liu KL, Wu J. Diagnostic performance of narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic and Japanese narrow-band imaging expert team classification systems for colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;13(1):58-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i1.58
  13. Grega T, Kmochova K, Hejcmanova K, Ngo O, Brodyuk N, Majek O, et al. Impact of narrow band imaging in prediction of histology of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85669-w
  14. Le NQ, Huynh TM, Vo D, Le HM, Tran T, Tran V, et al. Diagnostic performance of the Japanese Narrow-band imaging expert team classification system using dual focus magnification in real-time Vietnamese setting. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(27):e38752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038752
  15. Ahmed N, Bechara R. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and JNET classification for colorectal neoplasia: A North American academic center experience. DEN Open. 2023;4(1):e322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.322
  16. Zhang Y, Chen HY, Zhou XL, Pan WS, Zhou XX, Pan HH. Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(40):6279-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
  17. Sakamoto T, Akiyama S, Narasaka T, Tuchiya K. Advancements and limitations of image-enhanced endoscopy in colorectal lesion diagnosis and treatment selection: A narrative review. DEN Open. 2025;6(1):e70141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70141
  18. Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R, et al. A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013;4(4):244-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331
  19. Silva MA, Leal C, Ruge A, Fernandes A, Eliseu L, Vasconcelos H. Adenoma Recurrence after Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection of Colorectal Flat Lesions: Applicability of the Sydney EMR Recurrence Tool in a Non-Tertiary Centre. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021;29(4):247-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000518445
  20. Gomez Cifuentes JD, Berger S, Caskey K, Jove A, Sealock R, Hair C, et al. New Model to Predict Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyps ≥ 20 mm. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68(10):3935-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-08054-5
  21. Kudo Se, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(4 Suppl):S3-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052
  22. Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM, Regula J, Bretthauer M, Chaussade S, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020;52(8):687-700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1185-3109
  23. Murakami T, Kamba E, Tsugawa N, Fukushima H, Shibuya T, Yao T, et al. Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia or carcinoma: Large retrospective study. Endosc Int Open. 2024;12(7):E895-E904. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2337-3944
  24. Hong SW, Byeon JS. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. Intest Res. 2022;20(3):281-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00169
  25. Brule C, Pioche M, Albouys J, Rivory J, Geyl S, Legros R, et al. The COlorectal NEoplasia Endoscopic Classification to Choose the Treatment classification for identification of large laterally spreading lesions lacking submucosal carcinomas: A prospective study of 663 lesions. United European Gastroenterol J. 2022;10(1):80-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12194
  26. Bonniaud P, Jacques J, Lambin T, Gonzalez JM, Dray X, Coron E, et al. Endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia with different published classifications: comparative study involving CONECCT classification. Endosc Int Open. 2022;10(1):E145-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1613-5328
  27. De Lange G, Prouvost V, Rahmi G, Vanbiervliet G, Le Berre C, Mack S, et al. Artificial intelligence for characterization of colorectal polyps: Prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open. 2024;12(3):E413-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2261-2711
  28. Bragança S, Garcia AC, Alexandrino G, Oliveira AM, Horta D, Lourenço LC, et al. Validation of a novel BCM model for recurrence risk prediction after mucosectomy of colorectal lateral spreading tumors in a European cohort. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2024;48(7):102414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102414

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Tkachov, V. S., Kiosov, O. M., & Klymenko, A. V. (2026). Comparative efficacy of combinations of endoscopic classifications and recurrence models for large colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Modern Medical Technology, 18(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.14739/mmt.2026.1.341504

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Original research

License

Copyright (c) 2026 V. S. Tkachov, O. M. Kiosov, A. V. Klymenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.