Clinical-endoscopic features and clinicopathological correlations of laryngopharyngeal reflux in young adult men: an observational cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/mmt.2025.4.346688Keywords:
laryngopharyngeal reflux, gastroesophageal reflux, laryngitis, diagnosis, endoscopy, questionnairesAbstract
Aim. To determine clinical and morphological manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in young adult men using validated diagnostic instruments (RSI, RSS-12, RSA) in a single-center, cross-sectional comparative study.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Medical Educational and Scientific Center “University Clinic” of Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University between July 2024 and June 2025. Two groups of young men were formed: the main LPR group (MG, n = 91) and a conditionally healthy control group (CG, n = 64). Comprehensive diagnostics included medical history, general clinical examination, standardized questionnaires, and videoendoscopy. Endoscopic verification was performed using MedStar UE 3000 and KARL STORZ systems, applying the Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) scale (threshold > 14). Symptoms severity was assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) (threshold ≥ 13) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) (threshold ≥ 11), including the quality of life (QoL) subscale. Psycho-emotional status was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Results. The mean RSA endoscopic score was significantly higher in the MG compared with the CG (20.64 ± 9.49 vs 6.28 ± 3.32; p < 0.01). The most frequent complaints were throat dryness (52.74 %) and burning (64.84 %), which are not captured by standardized questionnaires and emerged only through detailed history taking. Videoendoscopy revealed variable pharyngeal and laryngeal mucosal changes; due to neuro-reflex and sensory mechanisms in LPR pathogenesis, findings ranged from minimal or absent to pronounced. Questionnaire data showed markedly higher scores in the MG compared to the CG: RSI – more than threefold higher, RSS-12 – approximately sevenfold higher, and QoL – 4.7-fold higher.
Conclusions. Among patients with LPR, reflux-associated laryngitis was most prevalent (78.02 %), followed by pharyngitis (52.74 %), chronic cough (56.04 %), and dysphonia (49.45 %). The “globus” symptom complex was reported by one-third of patients (34.07 %). Less common morphological alterations were detected in 14.28 % of cases, including laryngeal granulomas (5.49 %), edematous-polypoid laryngitis (3.30 %), and squamous papillomas of the oropharynx (5.49 %). Digital and visual endoscopic visualization of the laryngopharyngeal complex of patients with LPR demonstrated changes ranging from mild-to-moderate to markedly expressed (maximum RSA = 56, minimum = 7), indicating distinct clinical phenotypes, the absence of a single pathogenetic mechanism, and the necessity of individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The range of total scores in the RSI questionnaire survey of patients with LPR was 13–44 points, and in the RSS-12 questionnaire survey, it was 16–175 points.
References
Yadlapati R, Weissbrod P, Walsh E, Carroll TL, Chan WW, Gartner-Schmidt J, et al. The San Diego Consensus for Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 8:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003482. doi: https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003482
Lechien JR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Hans S, Nacci A, Schindler A, Bohlender JE, et al. European clinical practice guideline: managing and treating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec 24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09181-z. Erratum in: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09307-x
Lechien JR, Vaezi MF, Chan WW, Allen JE, Karkos PD, Saussez S, et al. The Dubai Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The IFOS Consensus. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(4):1614-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31134
Brar S, Watters C, Watson N, Birchall M, Karagama Y. Ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations and complications of reflux. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022;13(e1):e57-e64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2022-102184
Cui N, Dai T, Liu Y, Wang YY, Lin JY, Zheng QF, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: Updated examination of mechanisms, pathophysiology, treatment, and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30(16):2209-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i16.2209
Nykonenko AO, Haidarzhi YI, Kiosov ОМ. Endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease with different hiatal hernias types. Pathologia. 2022;19(1):58-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2022.1.252191
Suciu A, Popa SL, Dumitrascu DL. Upper Gastrointestinal Sensitization And Symptom Generation. J Med Life. 2019;12(4):316-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2019-0111
Bobin F, Lechien JR. The role of pH-impedance monitoring in swallowing disorders. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;30(6):406-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000841
Lechien JR. Clinical Update Findings about pH-Impedance Monitoring Features in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):3158. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113158
Lechien JR, Rodriguez Ruiz A, Dequanter D, Bobin F, Mouawad F, Muls V, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129(4):313-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419888947
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16(2):274-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Rodriguez A, Dequanter D, Muls V, Huet K, et al. Development and Validation of the Short Version of the Reflux Symptom Score: Reflux Symptom Score-12. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(1):166-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820941003
Kiren T, Arun T, Jacob A. Validity of Reflux Symptom Index in the Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease. Apollo Med. 2024;21(1):70-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_162_23
Wang JY, Peng T, Zhao LL, Feng GJ, Liu YL. Poor consistency between reflux symptom index and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis in Chinese population. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(1):25. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4783
Zhang C, Liu Z, Zhang J, Wang X, Wang J, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of Reflux Symptom Score versus Reflux Symptom Index in screening laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope. 2023;133(9):2104-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30489
Zheng X, Chen Z, Chen T, Zhou L, Liu C, Zheng J, et al. Assessing the role of dryness and burning sensation in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 24;14(1):4542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55420-y. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):8003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91973-2
Lechien JR, De Marrez LG, Finck C, Saussez S. Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10). Laryngoscope. 2024;134(9):3981-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31420
Kryshtal VM, Melnikova OV, Khorolets OV, Hancheva OV. [Laryngopharyngeal reflux: current perspectives and controversies]. Modern Medical Technology. 2025;17(3):205-16. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.14739/mmt.2025.3.335612
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 O. V. Hancheva, V. M. Kryshtal, I. O. Sinaiko, T. V. Strogonova, V. I. Troian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.











